Friday, June 20, 2008

Clearin' some Shit

If you're wondering where I've been, well I've been busy. Major projects don't do themselves, even when there's nothing to do.
I figured I'd return to the blagosphere by clearing up something I've figured out, but have never told anybody (I'm like that woman in Hitchhiker's who figures out the meaning of life just before the Vogons destroy the world, except I'm not a woman, and the Vogons represent apathy). A couple of blog posts I made earlier depend on this something, which is why I'm cleaing this up now (if that doesn't make sense, your not thinking fourth dimensionally).
Life has existed on Earth for about a billion years (out of the 4 billion years that the earth has existed, out of the 13.7 billion years the universe has existed). This has culminated in the rather sexy form you see now. Also, ponies! The weird thing is, sexy folk and ponies are related. The reason sexy folk and ponies look different is because of evolution. Evolution is made up of two basic things; natural selection and genetic mutation. natural selection means that physical features of an organism that are not useful to survival tend to lead to the death of the organism that possess them, while those that are useful promote survival. This is an extraordinarily efficient proccess. The obvious question is, where did these physical features come from in the first place? The answer is extraordinarily complex and subtle, but the simple answer is random changes in the genes of the organism. I really am simplifiying for the sake of brevity here, and if you want a fuller answer you should really read The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins. It's really dense, but remarkably clear, and it has no agenda like a lot of his books. Anyway, the thing to remember is that genes mutate and throw up new physical features, which either contribute to survival and themselves survive, or don't and disappear. This proccess worked perfectly well by itself for hundreds of millions of years.
Them something strang happened. Evolution had produced these things called apes. People still like to argue about what exactly happened, but apes became intelligent. They could analyse problems, solve them, and communicate the solution to other apes. Biologists can point out that a lot of animals can do this, but it seems the apes were just better at it at the right time. Eventually the apes began to record the things going on around them. They could also make tools to solve problems, rather than just using bits of their anatomy. What apes had then, was a remarkable combination of traits that simply changed the way evolution worked. Problem solving was previously the domain of a random proccess, the mutation of genes. The problem was, genes couldn't see the problem they were solving. To use an ancient phrase, the watchmaker was blind. Apes were not blind. Using a brain to solve a problem meant that they could see what was needed and try and make that, not as an extension of their bodies, but as a seperate and eventually reusable tool. There was another problem with genes, they only recorded what worked at the time, and nothing else. this wasn't true of the ape mind, it was capable of recording the past, building a library of ideas both successful and unsuccessful to draw on if and when the need arose.
This means you, ape. This is what you're suppposed to do with that spiderweb of neurons of yours. The problem is, we aren't doing it very well. Looking at problems and solving them isn't done very well at the moment (biofuel?), and we apes need to do science on more things, to see how they work, so we can solve all our problems. We're also not doing so great at that learning from our mistakes part, from what I can see (Hello, Mr Costa!). I just think its time for more Large Hadron Colliders, more Tacoma Narrows, and less Kyle Sandilands.

Disclaimer: As far as I can tell current knowledge of early human evolution goes something like: First there were mokeys, them some cool stuff happened, then uh...Egyptians? There are still a lot of questions about how we got to where we are today. I don't think the details matter so much to the point of this post, but if I've made glaringly obvious mistake, fell free to say so in the comments.

2 comments:

Avalanche said...

That's quite an interesting take on things (and none of the evolution-description-stuff seems glaringly wrong to me, but that's not the point).

Most people no longer appreciate scientific exploration, either. If they can't see how the solution will help them (and quickly), they don't care. No one thinks long term anymore, and no one seems to remember that some of the best scientific discoveries and solutions to our problems came from the least expected places. No one seems to realise that they could, and probably will, continue to do so.

You're right, we need more Large Hadron Colliders. You never know, those tiny black holes could end up solving a problem somewhere.

Anonymous said...

We also need much less Kyle Sandilands.

Problem is that evolution is now much less a factor in advancement as we have become more civilised and so stupidity keeps moving on from generation to generation.

Short term happens to be profit making, and so it could almost be construed that the evil corporations are holding us back because something may be hugely unprofitable. Unfortunately for us, these evil things also happen to produce good stuff and so we are also placated somewhat. Beware the voice of the Profit!

Also, they keep buying things so that when resources run low they can then use whatever they have bought to move on (seriously, what happened to that guy who invented a way to turn tyres into fuel?).
Maybe the problem might not lie with more science needing to be done (even though it should be done anyway). More science doesn't need to be done, just more implementation and less shallow thinking.

But... enough of that.
Large Hadron Colliders would be awesome. Everyone household should have one! It would help genetic mutation, if nothing else.

I also don't think that you have made a mistake anywhere.